Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Sony |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| -- | 2018-04-05 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xperia XZ2 Compact is a bit better than the LG X Mach, with a 79 score against 73.5. Xperia XZ2 Compact's body is somewhat heavier and a lot thicker than the LG X Mach. Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a little faster processor than LG X Mach, because it has more processing cores and a greater amount of RAM.
The Xperia XZ2 Compact features a bit more vivid screen than LG X Mach, because although it has a way worse 1080 x 2160 pixels resolution, a quite worse pixels density and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a much brighter screen. The LG X Mach counts with a better storage capacity to install applications and games than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG X Mach has just a little better battery life than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2870mAh. The Xperia XZ2 Compact shoots greater photographs and videos than LG X Mach, and although they both have the same video resolution, the Xperia XZ2 Compact also has a way more mega-pixels back facing camera and faster 60 fps video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.