Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-08-20 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a general score of 82.7, which is better than LG X Mach's 73.5 general score. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is a heavier cellphone than the LG X Mach, but both are 0.35inches thick. The LG X Mach has a little bit better screen than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little bit darker display, it also counts with a greater count of pixels per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
The LG X Mach counts with a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features just a little better hardware performance than LG X Mach, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro takes much better pictures and videos than LG X Mach, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rate and a lot more MP back facing camera. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has longer battery lifetime than LG X Mach, because it has a 33 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.