Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| -- | 2018-04-03 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has an overall score of 83.8, which is much better than LG X Mach's general score of 73.5. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s's design is just a little thinner but much heavier than the LG X Mach. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a little bit better performance than LG X Mach, because it has a greater number of cores and 5 GB more RAM memory.
LG X Mach counts with a more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater display pixels density. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a much better camera than LG X Mach, although it has a lower (4K) video definition and a lesser mega-pixels resolution camera.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a slightly better memory to install games and applications than LG X Mach, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a little better battery performance than LG X Mach, because it has a 3400mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.