Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-12 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is better than LG X Mach, getting an 87.9 score against 73.5. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro's design has the same thickness than LG X Mach, but it is heavier. The LG X Mach features just a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen and much worse brightness, it also counts with a greater pixel count per display inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
The LG X Mach features a superior storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a bit better performance than LG X Mach, because it has more RAM memory and 2 more processing cores.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a much better camera than LG X Mach, because it has a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution and a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a really longer battery life than LG X Mach, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.