Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-02-11 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Atlantis blue, Matrix purple and Phoenix red |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco X2 is a bit better than LG X Mach, getting a 79.3 score against 73.5. The Xiaomi Poco X2 design has the same thickness than LG X Mach, but it is much heavier. The Xiaomi Poco X2 has a bit better hardware performance than LG X Mach, because it has a higher number of cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
LG X Mach has a sharper screen than Xiaomi Poco X2, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher screen pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The Xiaomi Poco X2 captures a lot better photos and videos than LG X Mach, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Xiaomi Poco X2 also has a back camera with much more megapixels.
The LG X Mach counts with a much greater memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco X2, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Poco X2 features a really longer battery performance than LG X Mach, because it has a 50% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.