Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-20 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a global score of 76.6, which is a little bit better than LG X Mach's general score of 73.5. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 is a way heavier phone than LG X Mach, but both are equally thin. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a bit better processor than LG X Mach, and although they both have a 3 GB RAM, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has more processing cores.
The LG X Mach has a better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better quantity of pixels per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. LG X Mach counts with much more memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 captures way better photographs and videos than LG X Mach, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has a back camera with a way higher resolution. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a way better battery performance than LG X Mach, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.