Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-04-07 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is a bit better than LG X Mach, getting a score of 79 against 73.5. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S body has the same thickness than LG X Mach, but it's a lot heavier. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a little better hardware performance than LG X Mach, because it has a greater number of faster cores and 1 GB more RAM.
The LG X Mach has a much better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch in the display. LG X Mach has a slightly better memory for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a very superior battery duration than LG X Mach, because it has a 67% bigger battery capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S captures much better photographs and videos than LG X Mach, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a camera in the back with a way higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.