Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Apple |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | -- |
| 2017-05-26 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.06 x 2.98 x 0.37 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.87 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black and Brown | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 110.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.55 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XS is much better than the LG X venture, having an 84.2 score against 71.7. Apple iPhone XS's body is newer and thinner than LG X venture's, although it's a bit heavier. The Apple iPhone XS counts with an extremely better CPU than LG X venture, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory and a 64 bits CPU.
The Apple iPhone XS features a more vivid screen than LG X venture, because it has a bit larger display, a just a bit greater quantity of pixels per inch in the screen and a bit higher resolution of 1125 x 2436. LG X venture counts with much more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone XS, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The LG X venture counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XS, because it has 4100mAh of battery capacity instead of 2659mAh. The iPhone XS takes much clearer photographs and videos than LG X venture, because although it has a much worse resolution camera, it also counts with a lot better video resolution and a bigger aperture to capture better photography and video in low light situations.
Although Apple iPhone XS is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG X venture, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG X venture. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the LG X venture, giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.