Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | -- |
| 2017-05-26 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.06 x 2.98 x 0.37 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.87 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black and Brown | Black, Pink and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 110.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.55 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is much better than LG X venture, with a general score of 80 against 71.7. The Google Pixel 3 is a newer device, and it is also lighter and somewhat thinner than the LG X venture. Google Pixel 3 features just a little better processing power than LG X venture, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 3 also has more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 3 features just a bit better looking screen than LG X venture, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a slightly higher 1080 x 2160px resolution and a little better number of pixels in each inch in the display. Google Pixel 3 takes a little bit better photos and videos than LG X venture, because although it has a camera with much less MP, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better photography and videos in low-light situations and a way higher video definition.
LG X venture counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG X venture has a much longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 4100mAh battery size.
Google Pixel 3 costs a lot more than the LG X venture, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.