Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | -- |
| 2017-05-26 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.06 x 2.98 x 0.37 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.87 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black and Brown | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 110.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.55 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL has a general score of 82.9, which is better than the LG X venture's global score of 71.7. Even though the Google Pixel 4 XL is somewhat heavier than the LG X venture, it's thinner and also way newer. The Google Pixel 4 XL has a slightly better looking screen than LG X venture, because it has a bigger screen, a way higher 1440 x 3040 pixels resolution and a better quantity of pixels per inch of display.
Google Pixel 4 XL features a superior processor than LG X venture, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has more RAM. LG X venture features a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Google Pixel 4 XL shoots just a bit better photos and videos than LG X venture, because although it has a way worse 12.2 MP resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video resolution and a way larger aperture. The LG X venture features a bit longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 4100mAh battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG X venture, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG X venture. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Google Pixel 4 XL, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the LG X venture, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.