Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-05-26 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.06 x 2.98 x 0.37 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.87 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and Brown | Just black |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 110.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.55 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a has a score of 82.9, which is better than LG X venture's 71.7 global score. Both phones we are comparing come with Android OS (operating system), but Google Pixel 4a has the older 11 version and LG X venture has Android 7.0 Nougat version. The Google Pixel 4a design is noticeably newer, somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than the LG X venture.
Google Pixel 4a features just a bit better hardware performance than LG X venture, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Google Pixel 4a also has a higher amount of RAM. Google Pixel 4a counts with a little bit better screen than LG X venture, because it has a little bit better pixel density, a quite better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit larger screen.
LG X venture features a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG X venture has better battery duration than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 4100mAh battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 4a counts with just a bit better camera than LG X venture, because although it has a lot lower resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a much higher (4K) video definition and a lot bigger camera aperture for better low-light images.
Although Google Pixel 4a is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG X venture, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG X venture. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the LG X venture, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.