Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | Android 11 |
| 2017-05-26 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.06 x 2.98 x 0.37 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.87 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and Brown | Clearly white and Just black |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 110.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.55 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is a lot better than the LG X venture, getting an 87.5 score against 71.7. These phones have Android operating system, but Google Pixel 4a 5G has the previous 11 version while LG X venture has Android 7.0 Nougat version. Google Pixel 4a 5G's body is a lot newer and thinner than LG X venture's, although it's also just a little heavier.
Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a bit better processing power than LG X venture, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a little more vivid display than LG X venture, because although it has a just a bit worse pixel density, it also counts with a larger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution.
Google Pixel 4a 5G features a much better camera than LG X venture, because although it has a way less MP back facing camera, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a lot larger camera aperture for better photos and videos in low-light situations. The LG X venture features a much greater storage to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG X venture has a little better battery performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 4100mAh of battery capacity against 3885mAh.
Although Google Pixel 4a 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG X venture, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG X venture. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy LG X venture, and give up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.