Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | -- |
| 2017-05-26 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.06 x 2.98 x 0.37 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.87 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Black and Brown | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Metal | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 110.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.55 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 has a score of 89, which is way better than LG X venture's 71.7 score. Google Pixel 5's construction is noticeably newer, somewhat thinner and just a little lighter than the LG X venture. Google Pixel 5 has just a bit better looking display than LG X venture, because it has a bigger display, a bit greater amount of pixels per inch in the display and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
Google Pixel 5 counts with a superior CPU than LG X venture, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has more RAM memory. The Google Pixel 5 has a better camera than LG X venture, because although it has a camera in the back with lot less MP, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video quality and a much larger aperture.
LG X venture features a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Google Pixel 5 and LG X venture have extremely similar batteries, although the Google Pixel 5 has 4080mAh of battery capacity against 4100mAh.
Although Google Pixel 5 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG X venture, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG X venture. If you want to save some money, you can get the LG X venture, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.