Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | HTC |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | Android 5.0 |
| 2017-05-26 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.06 x 2.98 x 0.37 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.87 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black and Brown | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Metal | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 110.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 424 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 8.55 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 has a general score of 77.7, which is slightly better than LG X venture's 71.7 overall score. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but the HTC One M9 has the older 5.0 version while LG X venture has Android 7.0 Nougat version. HTC One M9 is a noticeably older and just a little thicker cellphone than LG X venture, but HTC was able to make it a little bit lighter anyway.
The HTC One M9 has a superior hardware performance than LG X venture, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the HTC One M9 also has more RAM memory, a 64 bits processor and an extra graphics processor. HTC One M9 features a much better display than LG X venture, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1920 x 1080px, the HTC One M9 also counts with a little bit higher pixels density.
HTC One M9 has a much better camera than LG X venture, and although they both have the same aperture, the HTC One M9 also has a better resolution back camera and a lot better video resolution. The LG X venture counts with a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than HTC One M9, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the LG X venture also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The LG X venture has a superior battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has 4100mAh of battery capacity instead of 2840mAh.
HTC One M9 costs a lot more than LG X venture, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.