Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | HTC |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | -- |
| 2017-05-26 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.06 x 2.98 x 0.37 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.87 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black and Brown | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Metal | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 110.00 | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 424 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.55 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The HTC U11 is slightly better than the LG X venture, getting a 77.6 score against 71.7. Even though the HTC U11 and the LG X venture were released only 0 months apart, the HTC U11 design is somewhat thinner but just a little heavier than the LG X venture. The HTC U11 counts with a little bit better performance than LG X venture, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the HTC U11 also has more RAM memory.
The HTC U11 counts with a little more vivid screen than LG X venture, because it has a higher display density, a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a little bit larger display. The LG X venture has a lot bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than HTC U11, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB.
LG X venture features a superior battery lifetime than HTC U11, because it has 4100mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The HTC U11 shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than LG X venture, because although it has a way worse 12 mega-pixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video definition and a way larger aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos.
Although HTC U11 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG X venture, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG X venture. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy HTC U11, else you can save a couple dollars and get the LG X venture, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.