Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2017-05-26 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.06 x 2.98 x 0.37 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.87 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and Brown | 16 777 216 |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 110.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.55 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ is better than the LG X venture, having an 82.5 score against 71.7. The LG V30S ThinQ is a newer phone, and it is also a little bit lighter and thinner than the LG X venture. Both devices in this comparison include Android OS (operating system), but the LG V30S ThinQ has newer 8.0 Oreo version and LG X venture has Android 7.0 Nougat, so it provides a lot of extra features and better performance.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a little bit better display than LG X venture, because it has a way better 1440 x 2880px resolution, a larger screen and a greater screen pixel density. The LG V30S ThinQ has a very superior memory for apps and games than LG X venture, and although they both have an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB, the LG V30S ThinQ also has 128 GB internal memory.
LG V30S ThinQ has a quite better performance than LG X venture, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM memory. LG X venture has better battery duration than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 4100mAh of battery capacity. The LG V30S ThinQ takes a little bit better pictures and videos than LG X venture, and although they both have a 16 megapixels back-facing camera, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a lot higher (4K) video quality and a way larger aperture.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG X venture, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG X venture. So if you need that extra features, you can buy LG V30S ThinQ, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the LG X venture, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.