Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | -- |
| 2017-05-26 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.06 x 2.98 x 0.37 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.87 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and Brown | Black and Gray |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 110.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.55 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is better than the LG X venture, getting a score of 81.3 against 71.7. LG V35 ThinQ is a newer cellphone, and it's also thinner and just a bit lighter than LG X venture. LG V35 ThinQ has a slightly better display than LG X venture, because it has a larger display, a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a better pixel number in each inch of screen.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a quite superior processing power than LG X venture, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM. The LG V35 ThinQ shoots much clearer photos and videos than LG X venture, and although they both have a same resolution camera, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a way better video resolution and a much larger aperture to take better images and videos in low light situations.
LG V35 ThinQ features a greater memory for games and applications than LG X venture, and although they both have an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V35 ThinQ also has 64 GB internal storage. The LG X venture has improved battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 24 percent larger battery capacity.
Although LG V35 ThinQ is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG X venture, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG X venture. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the LG V35 ThinQ, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the LG X venture, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.