Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | Android 10 |
| 2017-05-26 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.06 x 2.98 x 0.37 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.87 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black and Brown | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 110.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.55 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ is better than the LG X venture, getting an 81.2 score against 71.7. LG V40 ThinQ is a newer and thinner device than the LG X venture, but it is just a little heavier. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the LG V40 ThinQ has the older 10 version while LG X venture has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
LG V40 ThinQ has a little sharper display than LG X venture, because it has a larger display, a way better resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a greater screen density. LG V40 ThinQ features a greater performance than LG X venture, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than LG X venture, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V40 ThinQ also has more internal memory capacity. The LG X venture features better battery duration than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 4100mAh battery capacity.
LG V40 ThinQ captures better videos and photos than LG X venture, because although it has a back-facing camera with a much lower 12 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a much higher video quality and a way larger camera aperture to take better low-light photography and video.
LG V40 ThinQ costs a lot more than the LG X venture, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.