Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-05-26 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.06 x 2.98 x 0.37 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.87 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and Brown | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 110.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.55 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is a lot better than the LG X venture, getting a score of 87 against 71.7. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Motorola razr (2020) has older 11 version and LG X venture has Android 7.0 Nougat. The Motorola razr (2020) construction is newer and somewhat thinner than LG X venture's, although it's also heavier.
The LG X venture has a little sharper screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher screen density and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels. Motorola razr (2020) features a slightly better memory for applications and games than LG X venture, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a quite better hardware performance than LG X venture, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Motorola razr (2020) also has 6 GB more RAM memory. Motorola razr (2020) features a much better camera than LG X venture, because it has a much larger aperture to take better captures in poorly lited environments, a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a back facing camera with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
LG X venture features a very superior battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 46 percent greater battery capacity.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG X venture, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG X venture. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the LG X venture, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.