Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-05-26 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.06 x 2.98 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.87 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black and Brown | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 110.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.55 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is better than the LG X venture, with a global score of 85.5 against 71.7. Both phones we are comparing include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A51 has the older 11 version while LG X venture has Android 7.0 Nougat. The Samsung Galaxy A51 body is noticeably newer and somewhat thinner than the LG X venture's, although it is also a little bit heavier.
Samsung Galaxy A51 features a bit better performance than LG X venture, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also has more RAM. The Galaxy A51 features a little more vivid screen than LG X venture, because although it has a quite worse screen density, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a larger display.
The Galaxy A51 features a better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG X venture, because although it has an external memory card slot that supports 1,45 TB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. LG X venture has a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy A51, because it has 4100mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 shoots a lot better videos and photos than LG X venture, because it has a bigger camera aperture for better captures and videos in poorly lited situations, a way more mega pixels camera in the back and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is way more expensive than LG X venture, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.