Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-05-26 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.06 x 2.98 x 0.37 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.87 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black and Brown | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 110.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.55 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold is way better than the LG X venture, with a 97.6 score against 71.7. The Galaxy Fold is a noticeably newer and way thinner cellphone than LG X venture, but it's also way heavier. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Fold has the newer 9.0 Pie version while LG X venture has Android 7.0 Nougat.
The Galaxy Fold features a quite superior performance than LG X venture, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Fold also has 10 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a screen that's just as good as the LG X venture one, because although the Samsung Galaxy Fold has a just a bit inferior pixels count per inch in the display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1536 x 2152 and a lot larger display.
The Galaxy Fold has a much better storage capacity for apps and games than LG X venture, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 480 GB more internal memory capacity. Galaxy Fold has a better camera than LG X venture, because although it has a back camera with a much worse 12 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a way bigger aperture for better low-light photography and video.
The Galaxy Fold counts with a bit better battery lifetime than LG X venture, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity against 4100mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG X venture, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG X venture. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Fold, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the LG X venture, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.