Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | -- |
| 2017-05-26 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.06 x 2.98 x 0.37 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.87 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black and Brown | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 110.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.55 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 is a lot better than LG X venture, getting a score of 90.8 against 71.7. The Galaxy Note 20 construction is noticeably newer and thinner than LG X venture's, although it's also heavier. Galaxy Note 20 has a quite better performance than LG X venture, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Note 20 has just a bit better looking display than LG X venture, because although it has a little lower pixel density, it also counts with a larger display and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution. The LG X venture features a much greater memory for games and applications than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy Note 20 captures better videos and photos than LG X venture, because although it has a back facing camera with a lot lower resolution, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light images and video and a way better 7680x4320 video resolution. Galaxy Note 20 has a bit longer battery life than LG X venture, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG X venture, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG X venture. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy Note 20, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the LG X venture, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.