Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | Android 4.0 |
| 2017-05-26 | 0000-00-00 |
| 6.06 x 2.98 x 0.37 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.87 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| Black and Brown | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 110.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.55 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 6 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG X venture has a score of 71.7, which is just a bit better than Galaxy S III Cricket's global score of 71.5. Despite being the best in this comparison, the LG X venture construction is somewhat heavier and just a little bit thicker than the Galaxy S III Cricket. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but LG X venture has a more recent 7.0 Nougat version and Galaxy S III Cricket has Android 4.0 version.
Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket counts with a bit sharper display than LG X venture, although it has a way worse 1280 x 720 pixels resolution, a lot worse pixel density and a little bit smaller display. LG X venture counts with a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, and they both have 2 GB of RAM, the LG X venture also counts with 6 more CPU cores.
The LG X venture has a little bit better camera than Galaxy S III Cricket, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 video quality, the LG X venture also has a larger diafragm aperture and a lot higher 16 mega-pixels resolution back camera. LG X venture has a much better storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket, and although they both have exactly the same 32 GB internal memory capacity, the LG X venture also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG X venture has a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket, because it has a 95 percent more battery capacity.
Although LG X venture is a better device, it costs a bit more money than the Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket. If you are trying to save some money, you can get Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.