Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-05-26 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.06 x 2.98 x 0.37 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.87 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black and Brown | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 110.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.55 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 98, which is much better than LG X venture's global score of 71.7. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a noticeably newer and just a little bit thinner device than LG X venture, although it is extremely heavier. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has older 13 version and LG X venture has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a quite superior performance than LG X venture, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM memory. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit sharper screen than LG X venture, because it has a way bigger display, a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 and a little bit better display pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures much better photographs and videos than LG X venture, because it has a much higher video definition, a larger camera aperture to capture better images and video in low-light situations and a camera with a lot higher resolution. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a superior storage capacity for applications and games than LG X venture, because although it has a SD memory slot that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with improved battery life than LG X venture, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4100mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG X venture, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG X venture. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy the LG X venture, letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.