Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | Android 13, 12 |
| 2017-05-26 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.06 x 2.98 x 0.37 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.87 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black and Brown | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 110.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.55 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 has an overall score of 93.4, which is a lot better than the LG X venture's general score of 71.7. Even though Galaxy S22 is a bit heavier than the LG X venture, it's somewhat thinner and newer. Both devices in our current comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S22 has the older 13 version and LG X venture has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
Galaxy S22 features a more powerful processor than LG X venture, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S22 also has a greater amount of RAM. The Galaxy S22 counts with a much better display than LG X venture, because although it has a bit less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a larger display.
The LG X venture has a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S22, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. LG X venture has a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has an 11 percent greater battery size.
Galaxy S22 has a very superior camera than LG X venture, because it has a much higher 7680x4320 video definition, a larger aperture for better captures and video in low-light environments and a way higher resolution back-facing camera.
Although Galaxy S22 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG X venture, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG X venture. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy S22, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the LG X venture, giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.