Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | Android 13, 12 |
| 2017-05-26 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.06 x 2.98 x 0.37 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.87 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black and Brown | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 110.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.55 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is way better than LG X venture, with a 95.4 score against 71.7. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has 13 version while LG X venture has Android 7.0 Nougat version. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra body is incredibly newer and just a little bit thinner than LG X venture's, although it's notably heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a lot better screen than LG X venture, because it has a quite higher number of pixels per inch of screen, a much better 1440 x 3088 resolution and a really larger display. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has just a little better processing power than LG X venture, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM.
LG X venture has much more storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with better battery duration than LG X venture, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4100mAh.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features a lot better camera than LG X venture, because it has a larger aperture to capture better images and video in low-light environments, a way higher video quality and a camera with a much better 108 mega pixels resolution.
Although Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG X venture, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG X venture. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the LG X venture, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.