Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-05-26 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.06 x 2.98 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.87 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black and Brown | Black |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 110.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.55 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a score of 81, which is much better than LG X venture's overall score of 71.7. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has older 11 version while LG X venture has Android 7.0 Nougat. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro construction is newer, but much heavier and a little bit thicker than the LG X venture.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a little sharper display than LG X venture, because although it has a little less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bigger display. The LG X venture counts with just a bit more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has just a bit better performance than LG X venture, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy XCover Pro has a battery performance that is very similar to the LG X venture one, although the Galaxy XCover Pro has a 1% smaller battery size.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a little bit better camera than LG X venture, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has a way better 25 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and a much larger aperture to capture better photography and video in low-light situations.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG X venture, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG X venture. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy the LG X venture, letting go a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.