Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 42.1 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Maxwest | Samsung |
| Android 4.2 | Android 4.0 |
| -- | 0000-00-00 |
| 4.74 x 2.51 x 0.42 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 4.09 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 105.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.5 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 165 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MTK6572M chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1000 MHz processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 7.56 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.32 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 3.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| -- | f/2.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 5.61 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 3.4 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 240 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 2.72 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket is much better than Maxwest Orbit 3000, getting a score of 71.5 against 42.1. Both phones in this review have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket has the older 4.0 version while Maxwest Orbit 3000 has Android 4.2 version. Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket is a heavier but thinner device than the Maxwest Orbit 3000.
The Galaxy S III Cricket has a superior hardware performance than Maxwest Orbit 3000, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S III Cricket also has an additional graphics processor and 1,5 GB more RAM. The Galaxy S III Cricket features a lot better looking display than Maxwest Orbit 3000, because it has a much better resolution of 1280 x 720, a way larger display and a much greater pixels amount per inch in the screen.
Galaxy S III Cricket counts with a way better camera than Maxwest Orbit 3000, because it has a back camera with way more megapixels. The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket counts with a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Maxwest Orbit 3000, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 64 GB.
The Galaxy S III Cricket counts with a way better battery performance than Maxwest Orbit 3000, because it has a 2100mAh battery size against 1100mAh.
The Galaxy S III Cricket not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also cheap compared to the Maxwest Orbit 3000, making it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.