Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 45.9 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Maxwest | Samsung |
| Android 4.2.2 | Android 4.0 |
| -- | 0000-00-00 |
| 5.63 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 105.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 220 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6572 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.1 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.32 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| -- | f/2.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.38 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 4.4 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 900 hours standby time 24 hours talk time | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 3.92 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket has an overall score of 71.5, which is much better than the Maxwest Orbit 5400T's 45.9 general score. Both devices in this review work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket has older 4.0 version and Maxwest Orbit 5400T has Android 4.2.2. The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket is a much lighter and thinner cellphone than the Maxwest Orbit 5400T.
Galaxy S III Cricket features just a bit better processing power than Maxwest Orbit 5400T, because although it has a weaker 400 MHz graphics processor, and they both have 2 cores, the Galaxy S III Cricket also counts with 1,5 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy S III Cricket features a brighter screen than Maxwest Orbit 5400T, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better screen pixel density and a better 1280 x 720 resolution.
The Galaxy S III Cricket has a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Maxwest Orbit 5400T, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 64 GB. Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket features a bit superior battery performance than Maxwest Orbit 5400T, because it has a 2100mAh battery capacity instead of 2000mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket captures greater photographs and videos than Maxwest Orbit 5400T, and although they both have a same resolution back camera, the Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket also has a way higher 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality.
Galaxy S III Cricket not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also the cheapest one, which makes it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.