Search


Compare phones

Global Score
37.440.4
Basic Information
MaxwestSamsung
Android 4.0--
--2011-01-18
--4.23 x 2.13 x 0.49 inches
--3.32 ounces
Black and White--
$ 105.00$ 79.00
Display / Screen
5 inches3 inches
480 x 800 pixels 240 x 400 pixels
--TFT
187 pixels per inch155 pixels per inch
Capacitive, Multi-touchCapacitive
6.85.9
Dual-Core 1000 MHz processor processor
Yes GPU GPU
7.475.76
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot
01
Camera
5.00 MP + 0.30 MP3.20 MP
--320 x 240 (15 fps) (QVGA) video resolution
5.835.39
Networks
Wi-FiWi-Fi
GSMEDGE and GSM
SIM, Dual SIMSIM
2.52.7
Battery Life
--1000mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
--900 hours standby time
8.3 hours talk time
1.362.56
Other Features
BluetoothBluetooth 3.0
GPS--
Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity SensorAccelerometer

Comparison review

The Samsung Star II is slightly better than Maxwest Orbit 5700T, with a general score of 40.4 against 37.4. Maxwest Orbit 5700T has a really superior hardware performance than Samsung Star II, because it has a larger number of cores (and also faster). The Maxwest Orbit 5700T counts with a much better screen than Samsung Star II, because it has a just a little higher display density, a lot higher resolution of 800 x 480 and a lot bigger display.

The Samsung Star II features a superior storage for apps and games than Maxwest Orbit 5700T, because it has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 16 GB. The Maxwest Orbit 5700T has a slightly better camera than Samsung Star II, because it has a camera in the back with a lot higher 5 MP resolution.

Samsung Star II counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Maxwest Orbit 5700T.

In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Samsung Star II is also by far the cheapest, making this phone a no doubt choice.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.