Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 46.4 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Maxwest | Samsung |
| Android 4.2.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-03-16 |
| 5.98 x 3.07 x 0.39 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.48 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black and White | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 220 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Broadcom BCM23550 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Broadcom Videocore GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.01 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.32 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.27 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 250 hours standby time 4 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S9 is way better than the Maxwest Orbit X50, with an 83.3 score against 46.4. The Samsung Galaxy S9 body is a lot heavier but somewhat thinner than Maxwest Orbit X50. The Galaxy S9 counts with a brighter screen than Maxwest Orbit X50, because it has a way better resolution of 1440 x 2960px, a larger display and a way better pixels quantity per display inch.
Galaxy S9 counts with much more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Maxwest Orbit X50, because it has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 400 GB. Galaxy S9 features a better CPU than Maxwest Orbit X50, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a way better battery life than Maxwest Orbit X50, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy S9 captures much better photos and videos than Maxwest Orbit X50, because it has a way more mega-pixels camera and a lot higher video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 costs a little more money than the Maxwest Orbit X50, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.