Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 56.5 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Meizu | LG |
| Android 4.4 | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.52 x 2.84 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 4.52 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Blue, Green, Pink, White and Yellow | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 768 x 1280 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | P-OLED |
| 299 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6732 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A53 (Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.62 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 5.9 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a global score of 81.3, which is much better than the Meizu Blue Charm's 56.5 general score. LG V35 ThinQ's design is somewhat heavier but somewhat thinner than the Meizu Blue Charm. The LG V35 ThinQ has a little more vivid display than Meizu Blue Charm, because it has a larger screen, a much higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and a lot more pixels per inch in the screen.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit more powerful CPU than Meizu Blue Charm, because although it has a 32 bits CPU instead of 64-bits, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Meizu Blue Charm, because it has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal memory capacity.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with improved battery lifetime than Meizu Blue Charm, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 2500mAh. The LG V35 ThinQ features a way better camera than Meizu Blue Charm, because it has a much higher video quality, a back-facing camera with more megapixels and a much larger aperture to take better low-light images and video.
The LG V35 ThinQ is a little more expensive than Meizu Blue Charm, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.