| Global Score | |
| 56.5 | 62.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Meizu | Nokia |
| Android 4.4 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-10-19 |
| 5.52 x 2.84 x 0.35 inches | 5.93 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches |
| 4.52 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Blue, Green, Pink, White and Yellow | Blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 89.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 768 x 1280 pixels | 1440 x 720 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 299 pixels per inch | 293 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6732 chipset | MediaTek Helio A22 MT6761 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A53 (Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 GPU | PowerVR GE8300 GPU |
| 9 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.62 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.92 | 7.48 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 5.9 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Nokia 2 V Tella has a global score of 62.1, which is much better than Meizu Blue Charm's global score of 56.5. Both phones in this review include Android OS (Operating System), but Nokia 2 V Tella has a more recent 10 version and Meizu Blue Charm has Android 4.4 version. Even being the best phone we compare here, the Nokia 2 V Tella is a a little thicker and notably heavier phone than Meizu Blue Charm.
The Meizu Blue Charm counts with a little faster processing unit than Nokia 2 V Tella, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have a Quad-Core CPU, the Meizu Blue Charm also counts with a 64 bits CPU. The Meizu Blue Charm has a more vivid display than Nokia 2 V Tella, because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1280 x 768px, it also counts with a quite higher pixels density.
Nokia 2 V Tella features a bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Meizu Blue Charm, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 128 GB, the Nokia 2 V Tella also has 8 GB more internal memory. The Nokia 2 V Tella counts with longer battery performance than Meizu Blue Charm, because it has a 20% larger battery size.
Meizu Blue Charm takes a bit better photographs and videos than Nokia 2 V Tella, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Meizu Blue Charm also has a lot more mega-pixels camera.
The Nokia 2 V Tella is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, making it a no doubt choice.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.