Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
3G OnlySM-N9000
| Global Score | |
| 56.5 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Meizu | Samsung |
| Android 4.4 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| -- | 2013-09-04 |
| 5.52 x 2.84 x 0.35 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.52 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Blue, Green, Pink, White and Yellow | Black, Pink and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 768 x 1280 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 299 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6732 chipset | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A53 (Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T760 GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP6 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.62 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| -- | Micro SIM |
| 5.9 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 490 hours standby time 20 hours talk time |
| 4.48 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 is way better than the Meizu Blue Charm, with a overall score of 80.7 against 56.5. The Galaxy Note 3 construction is just a bit thinner but noticeably heavier than the Meizu Blue Charm. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note 3 has a newer 5.0 version while Meizu Blue Charm has Android 4.4 version.
Galaxy Note 3 has just a little better performance than Meizu Blue Charm, because although it has a 32 bits processor instead of 64-bits, it also counts with a larger number of faster cores, a greater amount of RAM memory and a GPU. Galaxy Note 3 has a bit better looking display than Meizu Blue Charm, because it has a little bit larger screen, more pixels per display inch and a way better 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution.
Galaxy Note 3 features a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Meizu Blue Charm, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that admits 64 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy Note 3 captures way better pictures and videos than Meizu Blue Charm, and although they both have the same aperture and a back camera with a 13 MP resolution, the Galaxy Note 3 also has a way better 3840x2160 video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has improved battery life than Meizu Blue Charm, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity against 2500mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Galaxy Note 3 is also cheap compared to the Meizu Blue Charm.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.