Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 59 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Meizu | |
| 2015-06-12 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.94 x 2.96 x 0.34 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Blue, Gray, Pink and White | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 160.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6753 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T720 MP3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.10 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has a general score of 80, which is much better than the Meizu m2 note's score of 59. The Google Pixel 3 construction is newer, a little lighter and a little thinner than Meizu m2 note. Google Pixel 3 features a quite better performance than Meizu m2 note, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 3 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Meizu m2 note features a bit better screen than Google Pixel 3, although it has a bit lower display density and a bit lower 1080 x 1920px resolution, they both have a same size screen. The Google Pixel 3 has a much better camera than Meizu m2 note, because although it has a worse 12.2 MP resolution camera, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better images and video in poorly lited situations and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Meizu m2 note counts with a slightly bigger storage for apps and games than Google Pixel 3, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 128 GB. The Meizu m2 note has just a bit longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has 3100mAh of battery capacity instead of 2915mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Google Pixel 3 is also a bit cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.