Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 59 | 64.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Meizu | Nokia |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-06-12 | 2019-06-10 |
| 5.94 x 2.96 x 0.34 inches | 6.01 x 2.83 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Blue, Gray, Pink and White | Black |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 160.00 | $ 90.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 293 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6753 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 SDM429 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Mali-T720 MP3 GPU | Adreno 504 GPU |
| 8.46 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 13.10 MP + 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.8 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Battery | 2990mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia 3.1 A is a bit better than Meizu m2 note, getting a overall score of 64.8 against 59. The Nokia 3.1 A body is newer than the Meizu m2 note's, but it's just a little bit thicker and a little bit heavier. Nokia 3.1 A counts with a little better processing power than Meizu m2 note, although it has less CPU cores , they both have 2 GB of RAM memory.
Meizu m2 note has a better looking display than Nokia 3.1 A, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Meizu m2 note also has a greater pixels quantity per display inch and a much better resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels. The Nokia 3.1 A features as much memory capacity for games and applications as Meizu m2 note, both of them have equal 32 GB internal storage and an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 128 GB.
Meizu m2 note has a slightly better camera than Nokia 3.1 A, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low-light photography and video, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Meizu m2 note also counts with a camera in the back with a much better resolution.
The Meizu m2 note features just a bit longer battery performance than Nokia 3.1 A, because it has a 4 percent more battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Nokia 3.1 A is also a bargain compared to others, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.