Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 56.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Meizu | LG |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-07-29 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.52 x 2.71 x 0.34 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 4.62 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Blue, Gray, Pink and White | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | P-OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6735 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53 (Single-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (640 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T720 MP GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.83 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.9 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is much better than the Meizu m2, with a overall score of 81.3 against 56.1. Even though the LG V35 ThinQ is heavier than the Meizu m2, it's thinner and also extremely newer. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little bit better looking display than Meizu m2, because it has a way better pixels amount per inch of display, a lot higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and a bigger screen.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a much faster processing unit than Meizu m2, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores. The LG V35 ThinQ features a way better camera than Meizu m2, because it has a higher 16 mega pixels resolution back camera and a lot bigger camera aperture for better low light captures and video.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Meizu m2, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ features longer battery life than Meizu m2, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity instead of 2500mAh.
The LG V35 ThinQ costs a bit more than Meizu m2, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.