Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Ace 3
LTEGT-S7275
| Global Score | |
| 57.8 | 62.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Meizu | Samsung |
| Android, Meizu Flyme UI | Android 4.2.2 |
| 2016-04-25 | 2013-06-10 |
| 5.57 x 2.74 x 0.33 inches | 4.77 x 2.47 x 0.39 inches |
| 4.66 ounces | 4.22 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 123.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 4 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 480 x 800 pixels |
| -- | TFT |
| 294 pixels per inch | 233 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 7.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6750 chipset | Broadcom BCM21664 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Broadcom VideoCore IV (250 MHz) GPU |
| 8.64 | 8.01 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 8 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 5.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | -- |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution |
| 7.81 | 6.71 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and GSM |
| Dual SIM | SIM |
| 5.4 | 5.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Battery | 1800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 8 hours talk time |
| 4.88 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Ace 3 is a bit better than Meizu M3, having a 62.2 score against 57.8. Despite of the fact the Galaxy Ace 3 is way older and somewhat thicker than Meizu M3, it's body is still just a little bit lighter. Galaxy Ace 3 counts with Android 4.2.2 operating system, while Meizu M3 comes with Android, Meizu Flyme UI operating system.
The Meizu M3 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Ace 3, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with more RAM memory and more processing cores. The Galaxy Ace 3 has a little sharper screen than Meizu M3, although it has a little lower display pixels density, a way worse resolution of 800 x 480 pixels and a much smaller screen.
The Meizu M3 has a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Ace 3, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 128 GB and more internal memory. Meizu M3 shoots much better pictures and videos than Galaxy Ace 3, because it has a camera in the back with a lot better 13 mega pixels resolution.
The Meizu M3 counts with a much longer battery duration than Galaxy Ace 3, because it has 2870mAh of battery capacity instead of 1800mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 not only is the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.