Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 61.9 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Meizu | Samsung |
| Android | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-12-08 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.29 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 290.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P20 MT6757 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.81 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 is way better than the Meizu M3X, with a score of 85.5 against 61.9. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A51 is a lot newer than the Meizu M3X, it is a bit thicker and just a bit heavier. Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with Android 11 OS, while Meizu M3X comes with Android OS.
The Meizu M3X counts with a little bit better display than Galaxy A51, although it has a just a little inferior pixels quantity in each screen inch, a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a little smaller screen. Galaxy A51 and Meizu M3X both have very similar CPUs, both of them have 8 processing cores and a 4 GB RAM.
The Galaxy A51 counts with a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than Meizu M3X, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage. The Galaxy A51 features superior battery lifetime than Meizu M3X, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy A51 has a lot better camera than Meizu M3X, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A51 also has a camera with a much better 48 mega pixels resolution.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, the Samsung Galaxy A51 is also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.