Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 61.9 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Meizu | Xiaomi |
| Android | Android 10 |
| 2016-12-08 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.29 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and White | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 290.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P20 MT6757 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.81 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a general score of 81.1, which is a lot better than Meizu M3X's global score of 61.9. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's body is much newer than Meizu M3X's, but it is thicker and notably heavier. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has Android 10 operating system, and Meizu M3X counts with Android operating system.
The Meizu M3X counts with a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, it also counts with a quite better count of pixels in each inch in the display. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Meizu M3X, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a little bit better performance than Meizu M3X, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a really longer battery performance than Meizu M3X, because it has a 57% bigger battery capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a lot better camera than Meizu M3X, because it has a bigger aperture and a way more MP back-facing camera.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a bit more expensive than the Meizu M3X, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.