Compare phones
Motorola Moto X
VerizonXT1060
| Global Score | |
| 62 | 68.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Meizu | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2016-12-06 | 2013-08-01 |
| 6.05 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 5.09 x 2.57 x 0.41 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 4.59 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Brown, Green, Red and White |
| Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 218.00 | $ 175.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 312 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Motorola X8 (Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro MSM8960) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 320 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.55 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 4.4 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 10.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.40 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.81 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 240 hours standby time 13 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto X is just a bit better than the Meizu M5 Note, with a 68.1 score against 62. Moto X's design is lighter than the Meizu M5 Note, but it's a lot thicker and was released many years before. The Meizu M5 Note features just a little better processing power than Moto X, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with 2 GB more RAM and 6 more processing cores.
Motorola Moto X features a little sharper display than Meizu M5 Note, although it has a little worse pixel density, a little bit smaller screen and a way worse 1280 x 720 pixels resolution. The Meizu M5 Note features a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Moto X, because it has 64 GB internal memory and an external memory card slot that allows up to 128 GB.
The Meizu M5 Note has a very superior battery performance than Motorola Moto X, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. Motorola Moto X has a better camera than Meizu M5 Note, although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for taking photographs and/or video in poorly lited environments, a worse 1920x1080 video quality and a back camera with a lot worse 10 megapixels resolution.
Motorola Moto X is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.