Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 65.9 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Meizu | |
| 2015-11-12 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.17 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 486.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 350 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL has a score of 82.9, which is way better than the Meizu PRO 5's 65.9 score. Google Pixel 4 XL's design is a lot newer, but a little thicker and somewhat heavier than Meizu PRO 5. The Google Pixel 4 XL has a bit better processing power than Meizu PRO 5, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has more RAM.
The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with just a bit better looking display than Meizu PRO 5, because it has a little bigger screen, a better display pixel density and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3040. The Meizu PRO 5 counts with much more storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Meizu PRO 5 also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 128 GB.
Meizu PRO 5 features a better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a way tinier aperture which is not nice for low light photography and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Meizu PRO 5 also counts with better video frame rates, a larger sensor shooting higher quality photos and a camera with lot more mega-pixels.
The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with greater battery life than Meizu PRO 5, because it has a 21 percent bigger battery size.
Google Pixel 4 XL costs a little more than Meizu PRO 5, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.