Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 65.9 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Meizu | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-11-12 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.17 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Clearly white and Just black |
| Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 486.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 350 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a global score of 87.5, which is much better than the Meizu PRO 5's 65.9 global score. Google Pixel 4a 5G's construction weights the same than the Meizu PRO 5, but it's just a little thicker. Google Pixel 4a 5G has a display that's very similar to Meizu PRO 5's screen, although the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a little bit more pixels per inch of display, a little bit larger display and a little bit higher 1080 x 2340px resolution.
Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a slightly bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Meizu PRO 5, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a little better hardware performance than Meizu PRO 5, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has more RAM memory.
Meizu PRO 5 features a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a lot smaller aperture which is not good for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Meizu PRO 5 also counts with a larger sensor shooting higher quality photographs, a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution and higher video frame rate.
Google Pixel 4a 5G has better battery duration than Meizu PRO 5, because it has 3885mAh of battery capacity instead of 3050mAh.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is a little more expensive than the Meizu PRO 5, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.