Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 65.9 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Meizu | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2015-11-12 | 2022-08-18 |
| 6.17 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mineral Gray |
| Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 486.00 | $ 498.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 350 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge (2022) is way better than the Meizu PRO 5, with a global score of 84.7 against 65.9. Motorola Edge (2022)'s body is way newer than Meizu PRO 5's, although it's just a bit thicker and just a little heavier. Meizu PRO 5 counts with a bit better looking screen than Motorola Edge (2022), although it has a bit smaller display, a bit inferior pixels quantity per display inch and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels.
The Motorola Edge (2022) features a bit bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Meizu PRO 5, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Motorola Edge (2022) has a bit superior processor than Meizu PRO 5, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Motorola Edge (2022) also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Motorola Edge (2022) counts with a very superior battery life than Meizu PRO 5, because it has a 64% greater battery size. The Motorola Edge (2022) captures just a bit better videos and photos than Meizu PRO 5, because although it has slower 60 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality, the Motorola Edge (2022) also counts with a camera in the back with a lot higher resolution and a bigger camera aperture to capture better captures and video in low-light situations.
Motorola Edge (2022) costs a little more than the Meizu PRO 5, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.