Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 65.9 | 72.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Meizu | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-11-12 | 2020-06-12 |
| 6.17 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.68 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Pearl white |
| Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 486.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| 350 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G Fast is just a bit better than the Meizu PRO 5, with a general score of 72.2 against 65.9. The Moto G Fast body is notably newer than Meizu PRO 5's, although it is thicker and somewhat heavier. The Meizu PRO 5 features a more vivid display than Moto G Fast, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels count in each screen inch and a higher 1080 x 1920 resolution.
Meizu PRO 5 has a bit better CPU than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Meizu PRO 5 also has a higher amount of RAM. Meizu PRO 5 counts with a little bit more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 128 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory.
The Meizu PRO 5 has a bit better camera than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a lot tinier aperture, and they both have the same video quality, the Meizu PRO 5 also counts with higher video frame rates, a lot higher 21 megapixels resolution camera in the back and a bigger camera sensor which gives a better photo and video quality.
The Moto G Fast features superior battery performance than Meizu PRO 5, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, Motorola Moto G Fast is also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.