Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 66.2 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Meizu | LG |
| Android Flyme 5.0 UI | -- |
| 2015-09-23 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.17 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Black and Gray |
| Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 350 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (1552 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is way better than Meizu PRO 5, having a global score of 81.3 against 66.2. The LG V35 ThinQ is a incredibly newer cellphone, and it's also a little bit thinner and a little bit lighter than Meizu PRO 5. Meizu PRO 5 counts with a slightly better looking screen than LG V35 ThinQ, although it has a little bit smaller screen, a way worse number of pixels per inch of screen and a way worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a better hardware performance than Meizu PRO 5, because it has a higher number of cores and a larger amount of RAM. The Meizu PRO 5 has a bit better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a way tinier camera aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs or videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Meizu PRO 5 also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality, faster video frame rate and a back-facing camera with a lot better 21 mega pixels resolution.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a superior storage for games and applications than Meizu PRO 5, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit superior battery lifetime than Meizu PRO 5, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity instead of 3050mAh.
LG V35 ThinQ is a bit more expensive than the Meizu PRO 5, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.