Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 66.2 | 72.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Meizu | Motorola |
| Android Flyme 5.0 UI | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-09-23 | 2020-06-12 |
| 6.17 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.68 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Pearl white |
| Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| 350 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (1552 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G Fast has a score of 72.2, which is a little bit better than Meizu PRO 5's score of 66.2. The Moto G Fast is a way newer cellphone than Meizu PRO 5, although it is thicker and somewhat heavier. Moto G Fast works with Android 11 OS, and Meizu PRO 5 works with Android Flyme 5.0 UI OS. The Moto G Fast has a little better processing power than Meizu PRO 5, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with more cores.
Meizu PRO 5 has an incredibly better looking screen than Moto G Fast, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better display density and a better resolution of 1920 x 1080px. The Meizu PRO 5 has a bit bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Moto G Fast, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 128 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Meizu PRO 5 captures slightly better photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a lot smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video definition, the Meizu PRO 5 also counts with higher 120 fps video frame rates, a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing better quality photos and videos and a back-facing camera with much more MP.
The Moto G Fast counts with superior battery lifetime than Meizu PRO 5, because it has a 31% greater battery size.
The Motorola Moto G Fast is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.