Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 66.7 | 73.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Meizu | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2016-11-01 | 2018-07-13 |
| 6.13 x 3.04 x 0.29 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Blue |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 435.00 | $ 107.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) |
| Super AMOLED | TFT |
| 515 pixels per inch | 267 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset |
| Samsung Exynos M1 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy J7 Star is just a bit better than Meizu PRO 6 Plus, with a general score of 73.1 against 66.7. Although the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star is newer than the Meizu PRO 6 Plus, it's heavier and thicker. Meizu PRO 6 Plus features a bit superior CPU than Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Meizu PRO 6 Plus also has more RAM.
The Meizu PRO 6 Plus counts with an incredibly better screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2560, a little bit larger screen and a lot higher display pixels density. The Meizu PRO 6 Plus has a bit bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Meizu PRO 6 Plus features a bit better battery duration than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a 3400mAh battery size. Meizu PRO 6 Plus counts with a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a smaller aperture and a back camera with a lower resolution, it also counts with a lot higher (4K) video definition and a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy J7 Star is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.