Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 66.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Meizu | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-11-01 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.13 x 3.04 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Black |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 435.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Samsung Exynos M1 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a lot better than the Meizu PRO 6 Plus, having an 81 score against 66.7. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a noticeably newer device than the Meizu PRO 6 Plus, but it is way thicker and incredibly heavier. The Meizu PRO 6 Plus counts with a much better display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per inch in the display.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features a processor that is just as good as the Meizu PRO 6 Plus one, both have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount. Galaxy XCover Pro counts with just a bit better camera than Meizu PRO 6 Plus, because although it has a lot tinier back-facing camera sensor, and they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a back facing camera with lot more megapixels and a bigger aperture to take better low light images.
The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a better storage capacity for games and applications than Meizu PRO 6 Plus, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows up to 512 GB. Galaxy XCover Pro features greater battery duration than Meizu PRO 6 Plus, because it has a 19 percent bigger battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Galaxy XCover Pro is also cheaper than the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.