Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 63.5 | 69.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Meizu | HTC |
| -- | Android 4.2.2, 4.1 |
| 2016-05-01 | 2012-10-02 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.29 inches | 5.29 x 2.75 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 4.55 ounces |
| Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 433.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 2 |
| 424 pixels per inch | 312 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X25 MT6797T chipset | NVIDIA Tegra 3 AP37 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP4 GPU | ULP GeForce (520 MHz) GPU |
| 8.64 | 8.82 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.60 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (100 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.1 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2560mAh Battery | 2100mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 360 hours standby time 12.8 hours talk time |
| 4.56 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
HTC One X+ LTE is slightly better than Meizu Pro 6, with a 69.5 score against 63.5. HTC One X+ LTE is a way older and somewhat thicker cellphone than the Meizu Pro 6, but HTC was able to make it somewhat lighter anyway. The HTC One X+ LTE features a little faster CPU than Meizu Pro 6, because although it has less RAM memory, it also counts with a higher number of cores (but slower) and an additional graphics processor.
The HTC One X+ LTE counts with a slightly better display than Meizu Pro 6, although it has a way lower 1280 x 720 resolution, a little bit smaller screen and a lot lower count of pixels per inch in the screen. The Meizu Pro 6 has a greater camera than HTC One X+ LTE, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a lot higher 21 MP resolution back camera and a much better (4K) video definition.
The Meizu Pro 6 has a superior storage for games and applications than HTC One X+ LTE, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Meizu Pro 6 also has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 128 GB. Meizu Pro 6 counts with superior battery performance than HTC One X+ LTE, because it has a 2560mAh battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, HTC One X+ LTE is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.